Asst. Prof. Dr. Aviruth Charoensup
Abstract :
Objectives :
Conceptual Framework :
The conceptual framework merges “Architecture as a Teaching Canvas” with “Contextual Resilience.” For a faculty dedicated to teaching design, the building must embody the environmental and theoretical principles it imparts to students. The defining architectural gesture is the stark contrast between mass and void, which addresses both form and climate. The dominant, dark upper volume signifies the strong foundation of architectural theory. Practically, it functions as a double-skin facade, blocking the intense tropical sun before it reaches the interior spaces. This dark mass is sliced by dynamic,
orange-hued angular geometries. These colorful cuts represent creative disruption and lateral thinking, while pragmatically capturing prevailing winds for passive ventilation. Furthermore, the concept prioritizes accessibility and safety. By raising the ground floor above potential flood levels, the design yields a highly open, multi-directional entrance. The building reaches out toward the campus through deep overhangs. This blends the exterior environment with the interior academic space, acting as a central, accessible hub for the university community.
Process / Methodology :
The design methodology bridged rigorous site analysis with environmental form-finding to achieve its functional and aesthetic goals.
Environmental and Site Analysis: The process began with assessing local floodplains and
tropical weather patterns. Elevating the primary structure and
ground-floor utilities was established as a baseline strategy to prevent flood damage and maintain campus operations during heavy monsoons.
Thermodynamic Form-Finding: 3D modeling and environmental simulations were used to design the protective building skin. The dark perforated exterior cladding was engineered to stand off from the inner walls. This creates a thermal buffer that actively reduces solar radiation on the learning spaces.
Programmatic and Aerodynamic Layering: Flow mapping dictated a multi-directional ground floor to serve as an open educational hub with access from multiple campus paths.
Strategic voids, notably the grand orange staircase and deep entry canopies, were aligned to capture and accelerate natural wind. This ensures that the semi-outdoor spaces remain thermally comfortable through passive ventilation.
Techniques and Materials :
The building’s construction techniques and materials were selected to balance environmental performance with strong visual identity. The dark, floating upper volume is constructed using a horizontal aluminum grill system. This technique creates a protective, breathable outer skin that shades the inner walls while appearing as a solid mass from a distance. In sharp contrast, the deep, angular cuts are clad in bright orange aluminum composite panels, creating a smooth surface that highlights the building’s dynamic geometry.
Inside, the building features a calm, neutral color palette consisting of black, gray, and light gray. This minimal interior reduces visual distraction, allowing the students’ creative work and the bold orange architectural elements to stand out. For the flooring, a combination of ceramic tiles, vinyl tiles, and polished concrete was applied. These materials were chosen for their durability, easy maintenance, and ability to support the heavy daily use of an active educational space.
Result / Conclusion :
References :
Atthakorn, S. (2022). Passive and biophilic design: Assessment of the semi-open educational atrium buildings in the tropics. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 21(1), Article 203.
Chenvidyakarn, T. (2018). Passive design for thermal comfort in hot humid climates. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS), 5(1), 1–28.
Colomina, B. (1994). Privacy and Publicity: Modern Architecture as Mass Media. MIT Press.
Hertzberger, H. (1991). Lessons for Students in Architecture. 010 Publishers.
Lim, T. W., Tongtuam, Y., & Ongsavangchai, N. (2026). Optimizing window-to-floor ratio and glazing for daylight and cooling in tropical educational buildings: A case study in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Journal of Daylighting, 13(1), 44-56.
Tschumi, B. (1996). Architecture and Disjunction. MIT Press.